LOGOI
Word Study

Dukkhā — Frequency

Frequency for dukkha across indexed Pali works, with sources and receipts.

Stable lemma · Pali

Dukkhā

dukkha · dukkha

Term ID
term:pli:dukkha
Scope
All indexed Pali works

Add this word to a research trail → The trail lives in its link; no account or cookie is needed.

Returned frequency evidence · no new statistic

Frequency profile

dukkha · Ranked corpus profile

Language
pali
Term identity
term:pli:dukkha
Exact scope
Indexed language wing
Denominator
attested_tokens
Returned rows
5
Attested works
5

5 of 5 returned rows visible.

Select two to four returned works for raw-row juxtaposition. Selection creates no metric and runs no query.

Occurrences, token denominators, normalized rates, and evidence states remain separate. A bounded ranked return is not a complete corpus table.
Returned Selected order Work Attestation state Occurrences Denominator state Attested tokens Per 10k Continue Juxtapose
1 Sutta Nipata work:pli:snp snp attested 44 available 20,164 21.82 Exact-work Concordance
2 Dhammapada work:pli:dhp dhp attested 10 available 5,252 19.04 Exact-work Concordance
3 Itivuttaka work:pli:iti iti attested 19 available 11,565 16.43 Exact-work Concordance
4 Udana work:pli:ud ud attested 29 available 20,047 14.47 Exact-work Concordance
5 Digha Nikaya work:pli:dn dn attested 54 available 143,998 3.75 Exact-work Concordance
Evidence boundary, sources, and receipt

Corpus totals and the bounded returned window remain distinct. Zero appears only for a known lemma in an exact work; unknown lemma and unavailable denominator are separate states.

  • Occurrences, denominators, per-10k rates, Range, and DP are preserved returned evidence; this workbench validates their invariants but creates no new metric.
  • Corpus totals may describe more works than the bounded returned ranked profile, while single-work and research-set totals close exactly over their returned rows.
  • Range and DP remain independent descriptive states for one exact ordered research set; raw-row juxtaposition never compares or recomputes DP.
  • Frequency evidence does not establish significance, representativeness, language-wide commonness, genre, chronology, semantic importance, causation, equivalence, proximity, order, or diachrony.
  • This projection adds no fetch, API, network, SQL, D1, provider, storage, persistence, export, or receipt authority.
Sources
source:pli:bilara-data
Receipt
unavailable · no_materialized_frequency_receipt

Source-by-source word evidence

Lexical authorities unavailable

The lexicon or etymology evidence was unavailable or incomplete; no partial records are shown. This is an operational failure, not evidence that no authority treats the lemma.