Iliad 1.1-5 · exact μῆνιν literal result

What this receipt covers

• Passages 1 passage cited

What this literal-result receipt proves

• The exact five-line Iliad 1.1-5 snapshot named here contains one case-sensitive Unicode code-point match for the literal μῆνιν when matching independently within each preserved source line.
• The one returned match begins at code-point offset 0 and ends before offset 5 in the recorded Iliad 1.1 line, with no normalization, case folding, tokenization, lemma expansion, morphology expansion, or cross-line matching.
• The result is bound to the exact Work, expression, Monro-Allen 1920 edition, Perseus digital witness, CTS locator, source identity, and normalized snapshot identity named here.
• The result cites the exact checked-in passage-evidence receipt identity, content hash, and assertion scope without widening that ancestor.

Authority boundary: this proves only the exact five-line snapshot result. The full Iliad Book 1 concordance total remains unreceipted.

Trace the complete source → witness → passage → result evidence graph

Normalized snapshot SHA-256

f7d6a96b5671cef1d5929ebd3ca2bf0fa69ee3e16bbdb368df3513345f30f6a0

Receipt content SHA-256

5130c99c117cf7dd20a07cbbf73c6adc8bb2dcad82219edcf1842bc72701df6a

Narrow receipt ancestry

• receipt:passage:grc:homer:iliad:1.1-1.5:perseus-grc2:evidence-v1

  passage evidence · assertion scope exact_recorded_passage_identity_locator_normalized_snapshot_and_receipt_ancestry_only

  Receipt content SHA-256 c137de9b3da7ef8b86627582a9b35fd5edbc338a002e518749cbe1f5e9f3af6f

Sources consulted

• Perseus canonical-greekLit Iliad TEI at the exact repository commit

  Exact source ancestry for literal result snapshot · Open source reviewed · State needs approval

Literal result boundary

• Boundary retained

  What this does not prove: It does not prove a full-book, all-Iliad, all-Homer, corpus-wide, or global count; the searched scope is exactly the five recorded lines Iliad 1.1-5.

• Boundary retained

  What this does not prove: It does not establish that μῆνιν is a token, the lemma μῆνις, an inflected form, a morphological analysis, a lexicon entry, a translation equivalent, or a semantic claim.

• Boundary retained

  What this does not prove: It does not prove textual correctness, freedom from transcription error, editorial correctness, or that the recorded five-line boundary is philologically preferred.

• Boundary retained

  What this does not prove: It does not include the source line, surrounding context, the full passage body, or any translation; the only source excerpt carried is the exact five-code-point query and match.

• Boundary retained

  What this does not prove: It does not establish alignment, translation, etymology, pronunciation, meter, textual variation, apparatus, manuscript support, or bibliography authority.

• Boundary retained

  What this does not prove: It does not prove corpus completeness, corpus release, acquisition, ingest, indexing, publication, live D1 presence, query-plan safety, readback, backup, rollback, or production deployment.

Where this leads

• Ask a question of your own →
• How receipts and citations work →
• The raw record (JSON, for agents and scholars) →