The corpus record

ἀμάτα

amata

ἢ εἰ (5)-πιὸτ ‘day

Generated live from the audited corpus — every figure on this page is a database query, not prose from memory.

What it meant

1. ἀματα · amata — Beekes

ἀματα [n.pl.]? disputed; hapax in SIG 421 A 5 and 26 (115). «1Ὲ "ἢ εἰ (5)-πιὸτ ‘day’> *ETYM Leumann 1950: 276 reinstated the view that this form is simply ἤματα ‘days’, which is no doubt correct. — [Beekes, s.v. ἀματα, p. 131]

2. ἀμάτα · amata — LSJ

= ἀδόλως, SIG 421A 5,26 (Aetolia, iii B. C.): but perh. ἄματα, cf. ἦμαρ.

Where it came from

No etymology authority pointer is recorded for this lemma yet — an honest gap, not an omission. The etymological dictionaries (Beekes, Chantraine, Frisk) are matched incrementally.

Downloads

Word record (JSON)·Concordance (CSV)·Frequencies (CSV)·Cite (BibTeX)

CC BY 4.0 with receipt attribution — every file carries its license line. What is exportable

Ask the librarian

Ask about ἀμάτα →